|
|
queryMary Hillis Freeman (X75660@CCVAX.FULLERTON.EDU)Sat, 15 Oct 1994 10:36:58 -0800
and minor players of one of the subfields of Anthropology. I have chosen my subfield, Archaeolgy, and I have some good ideas for my major player/contrib- utor, but a minor player has not arose from the depths of dusty old texts as of yet. Here is my problem: a 'minor player' must be a contemporary to the major player, someone who is not well-known but did many of the same things; and I must explain through comparison, why the minor player's work remains unsung. My question is, how do you find information on a person who isn't spoken of in the literature? A person might've been famous, but may not have published much at all, then again, the same could be true for an infamous person. Sev- eral factors could have played into why they were not well-known: gender, paradigm, geographical orientation, religious affiliation,etc. Heck, I suppose decisions like the Tedlocks' could even be considered as a factor! *impish grin* If there are any of you who might have some suggestions regarding a minor player or additional literature that would lead me to one, it'd be much appre- ciated. Ah yes, for those of you who might think that this kind of assignment is a good idea, think again. It is my own opinion that decisions regarding student assignments should not be made at 4:00a.m. after a gallon of coffee has been consumed. But hey, what do I know, I'm just a student. Sincerely, M.H. Freeman
|