|
|
More on TaussigJohn Mcreery (jlm@TWICS.COM)Tue, 11 Oct 1994 11:27:29 JST
Are we doomed to fall into that favorite "game" of academics in which we harangue each other about misreadings in language that generates more misreadings, a wicked example for Seeker of recursion in non-so- everyday life? You need your sleep. I feel a need to relax a bit. Reviewing our conversation, I find us in basic agreement. Here is where I see our common ground: Taussig the trickster is fun to read. By "re- presenting" some classic problems in new and unexpected ways, he draws our attention to issues that, far from being resolved, have fallen out of fashion and, perhaps, should be revived. His style is postmodern pastiche, without the dogged cross-referencing an older fashion in scholarship requires. Stimulation? yes; data? no. What, then, am I looking for? Tools that help me make more sense of those parts of the world in which I have a particular interest. How do I tell a good tool when I find one? First, I find myself seeing things I didn't see before. Then, perhaps, I find myself able to explain (or, at least, to account for) variations in what I see. I judge the power of explanations in terms borrowed from statistics: A classification is the the lowest form of explanation. At the same level of detail, a ranked classification is better, a linear metric even better, and curve-fitting the holy grail. Most work in the human sciences, and especially those of the thick description/interpretive variety (my own included) rarely if ever rises above the ranked classification level. IQ tests, survey research and econometrics are examples of efforts to go further, but the well- known price of such approaches is a radical thinning out through abstraction of the subject being studied-- the result a loss of detail that violates my first criterion. What, then, does Taussig add to my toolkit? Perhaps "representations" is a place to begin. But here I start as someone who has just read Gombrich's lucid survey of the history of mimesis in Western Art, has worked with Computer Scientists in creating AI programs, now makes a living trying to come up with innovative representations (ads, that is <g>) for corporations and the products they sell, has glanced at the very important work now being done in information design (my clients include electronics firms heavily involved in multimedia) and enjoys reading Stephen Gould (the short pieces in _Natural History_), for whom representations of evolutionary ideas are a central preoccupation. At the word "representations," my ears prick up. What I'm hoping to hear is that Taussig has said something about them I haven't heard before. John
|