|
|
Re: InterdisciplinaryDorothy J. Cattle (cattledj@WFU.EDU)Sat, 13 Jul 1996 07:38:14 -0400
anthro and interdisciplinary work, here is the outcome. It did not turn out the way I expected and I think it addresses us more than our fellow social scientists. However, it's where I have to leave it unless I get some further useful revisions. Thanks to those who took the time to respond to my original request. Communicating across boundaries, from differing perspectives, and with varied facts is the basis and reality of interdisciplinary scholarship. Anthropology developed as a multidimensional discipline and despite its recent splintering into narrow specialties, it retains a range of approaches to studying all facets of humankind. The congruency between what anthropology does and what interdisciplinary collaboration demands creates challenging opportunities. Some individual anthropologists still meet those challenges with insightful scientific curiosity guided by an appreciation for, and a recognition of, cultural diversity. [copyright 1996 by Dorothy J. Cattle - a "rite of passage" or, in other "words," write a passage...] BTW, to keep Mike from boredom with the mutilation and tatooing thread, couldn't those contributors see their way clear to doing some broader interdisciplinary connecting, to what? oh maybe surgery/surgeries, styles of wound closure, etc. including western biomedicine. See the connection? (admittedly a stretch...). Regards, Dorothy
|