|
|
Re: mutilation and ritualMarie K Conrad (mkconrad@ACSU.BUFFALO.EDU)Wed, 3 Jul 1996 16:10:02 -0400
> >>> the body. However, we are (as far as I know) the only culture that tattoos > >>> without ceremony, symbolism and ritual. With all this talk of a lack of ritual, etc. in Western "tattooing," is there anyone out on this list who has actually gotten a tattoo or talked to someone who has gotten a tattoo? We seem to be approaching this question with an a priori view that Western tattooing has no ceremony, symbolism and ritual, and trying to explain why this is, when in fact, I would argue just that opposite might be true. If tattooing has no symbolism, then why bother with "Mother" or a loved one's name? Why get the name removed to make a new loved one happy - it must mean something? And as far as ceremony, don't Navy guys still get drunk and tattooed as expected? It may not elegant, but it might still qualify as ceremony. Just my .02. Marie Conrad
|