carter pate (CPATE@UTCVM.UTC.EDU)
Mon, 3 Jul 1995 16:04:41 EDT

Just a delayed after-thought to Vance Geiger's post of Thur., Jun 22:

Nice deconstruction of Disney! Agreed that such manipulation of symbols does
not produce much food or clothing. But is there a chance it drains off some
"affluence" from the most affluent who will spend on such symbols, and thus
postpones the gluttonous raping of the planet a bit longer?

By the way, how about some comments on the recent article on Easter Island in
Discover magazine? What should be corrected, added or discounted?