Re: [PALEO,LING] ] Re: Language, gesture, etc.

Ania Lian (ania@LINGUA.CLTR.UQ.OZ.AU)
Sat, 17 Feb 1996 12:00:53 +1000

> If you are going to use "grammar" the way deconstructionists use
> "text", then I guess so. But that would make DNA both grammar and
> text -- indeed it probably makes *everything* both a grammar and a
> text, which makes neither term very useful.

Interesting. From a langauge teacher's point of view I think that the
separation of these has been so "unuseful" that I am really looking
forward to a change.