Re: Race and Vance Geiger

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: SS51000: "Celibacy: Everyday Presentations"
• Previous message: Dorothy J. Cattle: "Re: centural sensitivity"

Vance Geiger had an interesting comment on Roy D'Andrade's comment, which
reflects the anti-scientific perspective of post-modernism.
Unfortunately, despite the very long posting, I still could figure out
what his point was. Did anyone else get it?

Comments like these tend to have a polarizing effect for the discipline,
I think. I am not sure what value is gained by goring someone else's
ox? Can't we agree to disagree without bloodying each other?



Tim Wallace

• Next message: SS51000: "Celibacy: Everyday Presentations"
• Previous message: Dorothy J. Cattle: "Re: centural sensitivity"